Sunday, 12 October 2014

The Myth About Goan Stereotypes in Bollywood




The Myth About Goan Stereotypes in Bollywood
(Published in The Navhind Times on 10th Oct. 2014)

To continue with the issue of Goan stereotypes in Bollywood films, which came up again with the release of Finding Fanny (you can read the previous article here, here are some more thoughts on it. Let me argue, in effect, that the myth of the Goan stereotype flows not so much from the sins of Bollywood, as from a fiction that persists because it is so much easier to lay the blame on Bombay.

Caricatures and stock characters feature in cinema, TV and the stage, not just in India but beyond as well. True, they tend to stand out in Bollywood because Hindi films are a source of relatively unsophisticated entertainment. But when a serious film maker takes up a potentially contentious socio-cultural subject, they can do an admirable job with the same material. In the context of Goa, a case in point would be Shyam Benegal’s films: there is little fault you can find with either Bhumika or Trikaal

There is no need for me to elaborate on the uniqueness of Goa. It has been a favorite holiday destination for decades and its popularity continues to grow, both among tourists and as a film destination. Over the years, more than 125 films have been shot here and, among this year’s releases alone, there’s Singham 2, Kick, Hate Story 2, Yaariyan, Lekar Hum Deewana Dil, Ek Villain (in which Remo plays a don)3 a.m, Youngistaan, Jackpot, Finding Fanny, all of which were shot in Goa, and 2014 is not over yet.

So clearly, Goa remains the Number One state for film makers and they all have a soft corner and love for the place, or else why would they be here?  It’s unlikely they come in droves to Goa and squander millions of rupees only in order to mock and misrepresent local characters.

Now, if a Bollywood film maker wants Christian characters in her film, she largely has two options on where to set it: Bandra or Goa.  The general perception is that Goa is a Christian majority state, which it once was though this is no longer factually correct. This misconception may still remain because the decline in Christian population has been gradual over the years without any upheaval in society compared to, say, the changing demographic realities of Kashmir. Once upon a time, plenty of romantic films were shot in Kashmir Valley but, after terrorism took centre-stage, most films set in the Vale have been about conflict (Shaurya, Yahaan, Tahaan, Lamhaa, Mission Kashmir, Sikander, Lakshya and recently Haider). Amusingly and somewhat tragically, Yeh Jawaani Hain Deewani was shot in Kashmir but its scenic beauty was passed off as Manali. 

But in Goa, the transition to a non-Christian demographic has been so smooth that, outside the state, not many have noticed it.

If you take the portrayal of the Christian community as a whole in Hindi cinema, then for every vamp played by Helen (Helen Richardson; of Anglo-Burmese origin, I hasten to add) and others, there have been memorably sweet and noble Christian characters as well - John Chacha who takes two little children under his wings in Boot Polish (1954); Lalita Pawar, better known for her evil roles, played a motherly Mrs. D’Sa to Raj Kapoor in Anari (1959); and if anyone says Nancy and Tony in the same breath, then Amol Palekar and Tina Munim from Baton Baton Mein (1979) spring to mind.

But let’s look specifically at the Goa angle, and the common accusation that Goans are portrayed as drunkards.  

Just a quick mise-en-scène before we get to the point. The cultural fascination with drinking, and the lyrical and metaphorical elements of intoxication, are as old in this part of the world as this part of the world itself. From the Persian poet Omar Khayyam, to Mir, Mirza Ghalib and Harivansh Rai Bachchan’s Madhushala, to contemporary poets like Bashir Badr, much philosophizing has emerged from, and about, the Cup that “clears Today of past Regrets and future Fears”. It is no surprise that Hindi films have romanticized drinking in tragedy, comedy and in song, sometimes as an act of despair or rebellion, often as a metaphor, occasionally with a touch of astuteness to the lyrics, like Zindagi Khwaab hain Khwaab mein (picturized on Motilal playing the almost perfect screen drunk in Jagte Raho, 1956).

There have been songs on characters that are contemplating drink, drunk, or in the process of getting there. From vintage hits like HuiSham Unka Khayal Agaya (Mere Hum Dum Mere Dost), Jo unki tamanna hai (Inteqam) to Bachchan’s Thodi si jo pe lee hain (Namak Halaal), and songs from Shaarabi to Nana Patekar and Raj Kumar going overboard in Tiraanga (Pe lee pe lee) to Ganpat chal daaru la, the list of drinking songs in Hindi cinema is endless.
How many have been damaging to Goa and Goans, I wonder.

I can think of one: Pran frolicking in a bar in Majboor, singing “phir na kehna Michael daru peeke danga karta hai”. No other song has given the impression that Goans are drunkards as this Laxmikant Pyarelal composition may have, but this really is an exception.  

Keshto Mukherjee was the quintessential drunkard of Hindi films. He played a comic alcoholic in over 100 films and, barring Chupke Chupke (where he played a character named James), he never portrayed a drunken Goan. 

Another important stereotype to consider would be women who are shown drinking alcohol in Hindi films. For a society that is otherwise so traditional, inebriated women have been singing on screen for ages.  Who can forget Meena Kumari’s Na JaoSaiyyan (Sahib Biwi Aur Ghulam), Waheeda Rehman’s Rangeela re (Prem Pujari), to contemporary girls going Talli and the brilliant revival of Maine hothon se lagaye to (originally from Anhonee, made popular by Queen).  There have been female tipplers like Helen’s Monica in Caravan, but how many sloshed women characters can you recall from a film set in Goa? I couldn’t think of a single one.  

Even Helen’s Kitty Kelly in Gumnaam (the famous Gum chodke manao rang reli was shot on Vagator beach) says “Mujhe Shaarabi pasand hain sharaab nahin.

Beyond Hindi film tropes, one could argue that Goa’s association with alcohol comes from the simple fact that, for a population of 14 lakhs, the state has close to 9000 bar licenses. Compare this with a city like Bangalore: Goa has a fraction (15%) of Bangalore’s population of 96 lakhs, but almost four times the number of bars (Bangalore has 2500). So there is one bar per 155 persons in Goa compared to one bar per 4000 people in Bangalore. 

Bollywood didn’t make that up.

The fact is Hindi cinema is also changing for the better, and even middle-brow films have a mature understanding of the world they did not possess in the days our youth. There have been none of these imagined ‘Goan stereotypes’ in Hindi films these last couple of decades, though many films were shot in Goa during this time. Even before that, there isn’t a great deal of evidence to suggest otherwise. 

Here are some of the films set in Goa over the years –  it would be a challenge to find the typecasts in it – Jaal (1952, dir. Guru Dutt), Saat Hindustani (1969, Dir. K.A. Abbas and Amitabh Bachchan’s first film which incidentally was about the liberation of Goa), Bhumika (1977, Dir Shyam Benegal, based on Hansa Wadkars story), Ek Duje ke Liye (1981, Dir. K Balachander one of the earliest films that showed the landmark places and popularized them all over the country), Trikaal (1985, Dir. Shyam Benegal, Mario Cabral E Sa was a script-consultant ), Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa (1994, Dir. Kundan Shah)  Khamoshi (1996, Dir. Sanjay Leela Bhansali), Honeymoon Travels (2007,Dir. Reema Kagti),   Dil Chahata Hain (2001, Dir. Farhan Akhtar, only a small segment was set and shot in Goa but since then, every tourist wants to visit Vagator fort), My Brother Nikhil (2005, Dir Onir, based on the life of Dominic D’Souza, Goa’s first HIV patient), Guzaarish ( 2010, Dir Sanjay Leela Bhansali, Hrithik played a quadriplegic named Ethan Mascarenhas),  Singham (2011, Dir. Rohit Shetty who has shot almost all his films in Goa).

Where are the stereotypes?

First published in The Navhind Times on 10th Oct 2014


Film Review - Dr.Prakash Baba Amte




An Inspiring Story
 
Film:Dr.Prakash Baba Amte (Marathi with English subtitles)
Cast: Nana Patekar, Sonali Kulkarni, Mohan Agashe
Directed by: Samruddhi Pohey
Duration: 2 hrs 17 mins
Rating:  * * * 1 /2

There are reel heroes and real life heroes. The full title of this film is Dr.Prakash Baba Amte - The Real Hero and the latter part is no exaggeration.  Son of the renowned social worker Baba Amte, the life of Dr.Prakash is well and truly inspiring full credit to the director Samruddhi Pohey for telling this richly deserved story.
Baba Amte and his work his well known but the name of his son Prakash will be familiar mostly to those in Maharashtra.

Biopics are rarely made in India and on the whole they have been a mixed bag, some work some don’t. But the Pohey who has also written the screenplay has rock solid material on hand.  After all, how many doctors, whose fathers were well known in the society gave up everything and worked for the welfare of tribals and animals. It is no surprise that the Amte’s were the first father son duo to be given the prestigious Magsaysay award. 

The film also benefits immensely from the lead pair of actors. A large part of the story is told in flashback. Dr. Prakash (Nana Patekar) following his illustrious father’s footsteps lives in the tribal area of Gadchiroli with the Madia tribe. He has a doctor by profession and decides to live an austere life by helping the locals along with his wife Mandakini (Sonali Kulkarni) whom he met in his college.   

Apart from serving the local tribe Dr. Prakash is also an animal lover and started an orphanage for injured wild animals which came to be known as Amte animal arc, snakes, leopards, deer, you name it, they are all at the orphanage. The kind of rapport that the good doctor has with the animals is to be seen to be believed in the real life footage shown during the end credits which are not to be missed.

The issue of naxalism and excess by the police is also highlighted but more importantly, the film captures the essence of the tribulations he had and how he overcame them to serve selflessly. Along with the doctor, his wife also comes as a pillar of strength and their relationship is heartwarming.  In fact the Magsaysay award

Technically, the film is just about okay, but this factor can be easily overlooked. The screenplay is not watertight either and the editing also could have been sharper. Couple of scenes where they treat ill people could have been trimmed.  But this is just nitpicking considering what has been portrayed in the film.

Of the cast, Nana Patekar is in splendid form in the lead role, we have seen his histrionics before but this is a highly commendable and restrained performance. Sonali Kulkarni matches the lead actor on every step and they share a good chemistry.

During times when everyone is caught in a rat race (even if you win the race you still remain a rat as a wise man once said) this story of a man working tirelessly and altruistically has even more relevance. This is a must watch film for everyone.

Published in The Navhind Times on 12th Oct 2014


Film Review - Ekkees Toppon Ki Salaami




21 Guns

Film: Ekkees Toppon Ki Salaami
Cast: Divyendu Sharma, Anupan Kher, Neha Dhupia
Directed by: Ravindra Gautam
Duration: 2 hrs 20 mins
Rating: * * 1 / 2


Ekkees Toppon Ki Salaami is one of those off-beat films that dare to be different. It is not a low budget film and attempts to tackle a contemporary subject, of corruption and honesty. With a protagonist who is dead being the centre of a large part of it, the film in some way pays a tribute to that Kundan Shah classic Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron which incidentally also dealt with corruption as its backdrop.

Purshottom Joshi (Anupam Kher) is a BMC employee and they don’t come more honest than him. His sons Subhash (Divyendu Sharma) and Shekhar (Manu Rishi) are not exactly following their father’s footsteps when it comes to honesty. On the day of his retirement, the elderly gent is falsely accused of graft and is heartbroken. Soon he dies, but not before he makes Subhash promise him that for his funeral there will a 21 gun salute which is usually reserved only for state leaders.

Co-incidentally, the state Chief Minister (Rajesh Sharma) also dies on the same day and Shekar along with his girlfriend (Taanya Shrivastav) hatch a plan to switch the dead bodies so that his father’s wish can be fulfilled.

Although the plot sounds a bit far fetched, there are some comic elements that help it sail through although it is not very smooth primarily because it stretches quite a bit. Uttara Baokar as the chief minister’s mother who wants to take over his mantle is a hoot. Her rival is Jaya Prabha (Neha Dhupia) who had an affair with the C.M and now wants to extract her pound of flesh.

The film maker’s intentions are noble and the film is relatively engaging. The problem with many of these films dealing with an off-beat subject is that they want to tell a story that is uncommon and yet embrace the Bollywood song and dance routine which more often than not, looks out of place. 

Some of the blemishes no withstanding, Ekkees Toppon Ki Salaami is a cut above the rest.


Published in The Navhind Times on 12th Oct 2014

Film Review - Annabelle




Girls and Dolls

Film: Annabelle
Cast: Annabelle Wallis, Ward Horton
Directed by: John Leonetti
Duration: 1 hr 48 mins
Rating: * *

In present day, any film that becomes successful at the box office has a very high chance of a sequel coming up sooner rather than later. If it is a horror film, the chances go up drastically. Annabelle is a prequel to The Conjuring, one of the biggest hits of last year. That James Wan film may have had a lot of mumbo-jumbo about evil but it was one of the better scary films in recent times.

Annabelle is directed by cinematographer John Leonetti (who also shot The Conjuring) and the level of abstract notions of evil, devil and ‘demons seeking the soul’ goes up a few notches higher in this film. In The Conjuring one could ignore that claptrap because one, it comes up only towards the end and two, it was an engaging film on most counts. 

Annabelle on the other hand is largely single track and for a film made in the 21stcentury lines like “Ghosts haunt specific places whereas demons, they want a soul and the soul has to be offered to them”. Oh yeah.

Set in the 60’s, John (Ward Horton) and Mia (Annabelle Wallis) are a couple expecting their first child. During the pregnancy, their neighbors are killed by members of a satanic cult and the couple is also attacked. A rather creepy looking doll which was disposed off in the trash makes reappearance when they move to a different house.

All the things that should happen when you have a doll like that in the house do happen- strange sounds emanate, doors close on their own, sewing machines operate automatically. All that might give a momentary scare but on the whole it doesn’t engross you. Usually in horror films, all the ‘explanations’ about spirits, and haunted places come towards the end and you don’t mind it because that comprises of an undersized part of the film. But here all the so called rationalization happens at the mid point with dialogues like “The devil preys on the weak and the vulnerable” and “Evil is constant nothing that has not been created can be destroyed” or words to that effect.

There is the odd James Wan touch to the film (he is the co-producer) like the elevator scene for instance.

Annabelle, a real life doll like that will be far more exciting than this film. 

Published in The Navhind Times on 12th Oct 2014